Tuesday, November 23, 2010
snapshots
Friday, September 3, 2010
the sunset at st birinus
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
stranded on the rocks
I jumped across the little stream. My trainers squelched in the sand and my shadow, long and unusual, wobbled about as I found my balance. It looked funny today, my shadow. The wind was blustering in from the Atlantic, as it always does at Newgale, and ruffling my hair. The uneven sand forced the dark shape to roll over the undulations in the beach like a hall of mirrors. I felt a bit like Perseus, doing his best not to catch sight of Medusa while her shadow snaked about in the sand.
The sea was sparkling. Under a pure blue sky, it gleamed to the horizon in the afternoon sun. As the waves pounded into the shore and the surfers stumbled onto their boards, the sunlight caught the spray and lit up the surf. Crash, boom, seep, went the ocean in its ancient rhythm. I shoved my hands into my hoodie and strolled around the headland. On this part of the coastline, the tide goes out a long way, leaving a vast expanse of flat wet sand. Studded with pebbles and rocks, the beach stretches out and around the cliffs, exposing an extra half-mile of sand that sweeps round the bay. It's here where stratus rocks lie angled into the shore, and deep diagonal caves gape into the cliff-face. Today, as I walked (looking for one cove in particular) I saw children in wet-suits splashing in deep green rock-pools that had formed in some of the caves, dogs chasing bouncing rubber balls and white toes pointing skyward to catch the sun. These natural alcoves it seems, form natural windbreaks for young families, away from the kite-surfers and trendy couples of the main stretch at Newgale. Tartan blankets flapped in the breeze, held down by thermos flasks and coolbags.
I like being alone. It bothers me sometimes, makes me worry about the moments when it won't be possible to escape the company of others. For me though, holidays like this are a perfect chance to wander anonymously across the sand, clamber over dripping rocks and explore caves and rock-pools with no thought of time or responsibility. We had laughed at Dad when I was younger - how he would disappear along the beach with his metal detector. For an hour or so, Mum would wonder whether we should 'get on with lunch' without him, and I would pull out my copy of 'A Brief History of Time' or start looking for stones to skim.
I think I understand now. I'm often more like him than I'm prepared to admit. No family were waiting for me though today.
I found it. It looked a bit different when the tide was out, but this must have been the place. Rocks zig-zagged in the wet sand like jagged stepping stones, huge walls either side, and at the back, a smooth flat rock about the size of a table with another smaller stone in front. Behind, and unseen from the beach, there was a dark underpass, a tunnel connecting to the next cove along the shoreline. It was here that I had been almost stranded by the tide two years ago. I remember sitting on the table-rock, Bible in hand as the water lapped around my feet and surged in through the tunnel. It was different today. Sometimes, I reasoned, the lesson is about what you do when you're waiting for the tide to change.
-
So, home tomorrow. It's been a great holiday this - mathematics, brain-twisting rubik's cube games, cats named after the Greek alphabet, good food, great company, sunshine, church, windy-walks along the cliffs, long lie-ins and hardly a thought about the world I left behind. I kind of wish though, I could just... well... keep that mobile phone switched off... it's so nice without it. And a world without facebook seems somehow, simpler, better, more... innocent and unaware. As one who complicates things beyond belief sometimes, I'm all for keeping things simple - believe it or not. Maybe, in some ways all this is just God's way of telling me that even in the seeping, surging craziness of life around me, I should spend more time stranded on the rock.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
a tale of two churches
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Set Theory in Pembrokeshire
Red wine was coursing round my system. My nerves felt like they were on fire and yet were somehow slowly dropping off to sleep. The mathematics continued:
(∃x)(∀y)(y∉x)
"So this states (it's an axiom really) that there exists a set x for all y, such that y is not a member of x. It vacuously proves the existence of the empty set..."
Now then. I'm on holiday. The sun had already dipped into a golden sky over the sparkling sea, and the whitest of moons had joined Venus in the fading sky. What on Earth was I doing then, learning the basic principles of Set Theory? This, I reasoned, is what happens when you go on holiday and stay with a brilliant mathematician who is also an atheist.
I was wondering, quite nervously, whether he was beguiling me like an ingenious barrister. There is an empty set... There can't logically be a set that contains every other set... Therefore... a universal, omniscient deity can't logically exist... what do you think about that, Slighty-Tipsy-God-boy?
Thankfully, there was no such cliff-edge in the conversation, and no sheer drop into the chasm of metaphysics or theology. Clive simply cycled through his new tee-shirt designs, explaining as he went. His favourite proofs seem to describe ways of determining the mathematical constant pi (π)... which appears in sums and integrals and other complicated looking formulae, inscribed on mugs, bathroom tiles, the front door, and yes, several dozen custom-made tee-shirts. In case you're interested, if you square π and divide it by 6, you get the same number as you would by adding together the reciprocals of all the squares of all the real positive numbers. And if you're not, well - I doubt you're alone.
I love mathematicians. In essence they're like mountain-bikers. They get excited by thrills that most of us would find terrifying. They love talking about the tools they use, the problems they had to solve and the awesomeness of finding yourself exactly where you wanted to be; still alive, if a little-shaken up by what you've been through, and desperate to tell anyone who will listen. Exhilaration comes in strange forms for the math-boffins. They relive their calculations through the Nth dimension, the scree-laden slope of a discontinuous function, and the possibilities and probabilities that perhaps no-one else thinks about. They ride rough-shod over primes, googolplexes, equations and singularities, gripping the handlebars given them by Euler and Euclid and Gauss, like there's no 'TODAY+1'. This morning, for example, I was more than a little astonished to discover that there are different orders of infinity. In other words, some infinities are bigger than others. I jest not. But who knew?
-
I'm reluctant to let you into a secret. Here it is though: Wales is beautiful. I guess, my reluctancy stems from the fact that this part of the country is often completely ignored - and this enhances its lonely desperate beauty. Today, I stood completely alone on the top of a grassy mountain in the Preseli hills. The wind was rushing through my hair, warm and salty as it blew in from the Atlantic. In the distance, the ocean stretched away, cool and blue, deep and mysterious. Great and ancient hills rose up around me, bathed in the rolling, changing shadows cast by low clouds and cheery sunlight. It was breathtakingly peaceful. And with no phone, no facebook, no email, nothing to connect me to the other world, I felt completely free and alone with God.
The God who thought up π and made it the exact ratio of a circle's circumference and diameter. The God who invented gravity and chuckled when Isaac Newton cottoned-on to the way it works. The God who positioned Venus exactly where it is, so that one-day, in a little village in Pembrokeshire, a confused former physics graduate could spot it sparkling next to the moon and smile while the sun dipped majestically below the horizon.
I love that God; even when I'm slightly inebriated and confused by Set Theory.
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
home for a bit of perspective, then off again...
Monday, August 23, 2010
Further Adventures in Devon
I've just driven from Bigbury-on-Sea to Kingsbridge through a cloud, in the dark, through single-track country lanes in the searing rain. As I flicked my lights from dipped to main beam, and the ghostly hedges raced past, I aimed the car at the dark and shot through the torrent, hoping beyond hope that I had read the road well.
"You know the sharp bend to the right," he said, peering out of his open window.
"Er, not really," I said, "I'm not from round here."
"Well," he went on in his Devonshire accent, "iss flooded." The rain pounded in and spat on my face as the stranger leaned out of his car. "... and again, jus' before the narrows... completely flooded it is, an you won' see it in the dark so jus go easy..."
"Cheers mate," I said soundingly uncharacteristically Cockneyish. As it was, the passing Devonian was quite right. At the sharp bend a diluvian flood had submerged the road and I had to rev up to hurtle through it. I wondered at that point, whether I'd get back to Kingsbridge at all. The deep water fountained up either side of the car and was briefly illuminated by the headlamps. I loosened my grip on the steering wheel and tested the brakes.
Funnily enough, I still wouldn't change this for a package holiday to 'the sun'. I've never really understood why people go to the trouble of flying hundreds of miles in a tin can, essentially to spend a fortnight reading a book. A book, which I might add, they have taken with them.
I like holidays to be adventures. Where you feel like you could do anything today - see dinosaur fossils, dig a hole so deep you can bury your dad, run like Cheetarah along a flat sandy beach, or climb the highest cliff or the tallest mountain, just because it'd be fun to see the world from the top. I like stuff to do: walks to ramble through and games of chess, draughts, pit or rummy and end the day with a steaming cup of well-earned hot-chocolate.
What, you might ask, did I do today then?
Well, I have to admit a little sheepishly that I put my feet up and read a book. Alright, alright. It wasn't the only thing I did. Actually, I did walk along the cliff tops and I did manage to have a little prayer time with the waves crashing beneath me. And I did play some Playstation with Jospeh, who is very nearly 3 and trained himself to use the potty. For some reason, he seems to find it easier to refer to me as 'Daddy's Friend', rather than my name - which is certainly not a challenge of pronunciation. Still, it was rather good fun to use the piano to make up thunder, rain and lightning music. His face lit up whenever he got to play the deep rumbling notes.
"Andrew guess how much this was," said Rachel in the doorway. She was holding the instant barbecue fondue set we never used because it had been raining. It was no more than a tray of oversized chocolate buttons, sealed in aluminium and cardboard.
"Twelve pounds?" said Andrew.
"No! That's not the way it works!" said she, crestfallen. "You're supposed to guess lower than that!"
It struck me that the rules of this guessing game aren't as simple as they seem. In fact, they're not simple at all. In some sort of inverted way, the object of the game is to help the person feel the rush of self-assertion at purchasing some sort of a bargain, or solidarity in having been ripped-off. And as men, we are required to become experts at working out which it is and sympathising accordingly. As men of course, we are quite quite rubbish at that most of the time. Making an accurate estimate that achieves the goal can often be tricky for items with a variable price. Andrew had gone too high of course. The actual retail price was about £7 which Rachel clearly considered to be a lot. By going higher, Andrew had inadvertently shown that what she considered to be high, was not that high at all, and hence her perception of the bargain she felt she'd achieved (£3) was undermined. Fascinating. I wondered whether women fully understand the risk of games like this. It made me ponder the roles of husband and wife really carefully actually...
... I know, this is crazy. It was only a fleeting thing. What if, though, I thought to myself, this highlights something about the way the marriage relationship works. One person brings a question or suggestion to the two-person team that is a vulnerable one. How do I look? Is it OK if I go off to the pub with the lads? Darling, what would you say to us getting a puppy? To a difference engine, an algorithm or a computer, these are all quite straightforward questions. You look terrible in my opinion, says the android husband. No, it is not OK, you stand a 78% chance of returning drunk. And, "I would say 'yes' because it would delay the decision about having children by approximately 16 months and logically this is advantageous..."
You can see the android husband not lasting very long. I wondered tonight just how much marriage (or maybe even any close relationship) is about learning and adapting to the codes we use; the questions behind the questions. The give-and-take dance that two people slowly learn as they grow together, stepping on each other's toes, out-of-time with the music, frustrating and loving and living and learning. I had a little smile to myself, as I realised how complicated I seem to make things for just myself. It'll be a lot of fun one day, learning to dance.
Then I realised that without the music, without understanding the rhythm, and without really flowing in time with the person God gave you, it'd be pretty difficult to do it well, if it all. So, how do people cope without God binding it all together? It's a great mystery.
Maybe one day I'll find out whether I'm right. If I can drive out of the county without getting swept away in the deluge.